Little guy: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[File:Demoncore.png|thumb|The Demon Core is a '''little guy.''']] | [[File:{{#setmainimage:Demoncore.png}}|thumb|The Demon Core is a '''little guy.''']] | ||
A '''little guy''' is a type of object that can be found in places. Despite popular belief, the size of a '''little guy''' has little bearing on the subject's '''little guy''' status. Things of all sizes can be '''little guys''' if they fit the vibe. '''Little guy''' status depends on a combination of factors that include sopping-wettedness, emotional fragility, physical vulnerability, "cute" factor, recognizability, cultural impact and more. A '''little guy''' does not necessarily have to be a creature, but can be anything you can point at and say, "'''little guy!'''" | A '''little guy''' is a type of object that can be found in places. Despite popular belief, the size of a '''little guy''' has little bearing on the subject's '''little guy''' status. Things of all sizes can be '''little guys''' if they fit the vibe. '''Little guy''' status depends on a combination of factors that include sopping-wettedness, emotional fragility, physical vulnerability, "cute" factor, recognizability, cultural impact and more. A '''little guy''' does not necessarily have to be a creature, but can be anything you can point at and say, "'''little guy!'''" | ||
== CESSBM scale == | == CESSBM scale == | ||
[https://littleguysdaily.tumblr.com Some scholars] have proposed a scientific scale of '''little guy''' that utilizes several metrics to rank and categorize '''little guys''' and their abilities. On a scale of zero to three, the '''little guys''' are rated on their Chuckability, Engaging, Squishiness, Splorpability, Bones, and Media Literacy. This scale has gained some traction amongst '''little guy''' scholars, though it has yet to attain widespread adoption; many '''little guy''' enthusiasts<sup>[[Special:WantedPages|[who?]]]</sup> argue that '''little guys''' are impossible to quantify on a scale due to | [https://littleguysdaily.tumblr.com Some scholars] have proposed a scientific scale of '''little guy''' that utilizes several metrics to rank and categorize '''little guys''' and their abilities. On a scale of zero to three, the '''little guys''' are rated on their Chuckability, Engaging, Squishiness, Splorpability, Bones, and Media Literacy. This scale has gained some traction amongst '''little guy''' scholars, though it has yet to attain widespread adoption; many '''little guy''' enthusiasts<sup>[[Special:WantedPages|[who?]]]</sup> argue that '''little guys''' are impossible to quantify on a scale due to their transient and impressionistic qualities. | ||
[[File:Littleguys.png|center|thumb| | [[File:Littleguys.png|center|thumb|A categorization chart for the CESSBM scale.]] | ||
== See also == | |||
* [[Dog]] | |||
* [[Hideo Kojima]] | |||
* [[Big guy]] | |||
* [[Awawi]] | |||
== References == | |||
# [[File:Pyrrharctia isabella - Caterpillar - Devonian Fossil Gorge - Iowa City - 2014-10-15 - image 1.jpg|32x32px]] | |||
Latest revision as of 20:22, 13 March 2026
A little guy is a type of object that can be found in places. Despite popular belief, the size of a little guy has little bearing on the subject's little guy status. Things of all sizes can be little guys if they fit the vibe. Little guy status depends on a combination of factors that include sopping-wettedness, emotional fragility, physical vulnerability, "cute" factor, recognizability, cultural impact and more. A little guy does not necessarily have to be a creature, but can be anything you can point at and say, "little guy!"
CESSBM scale
Some scholars have proposed a scientific scale of little guy that utilizes several metrics to rank and categorize little guys and their abilities. On a scale of zero to three, the little guys are rated on their Chuckability, Engaging, Squishiness, Splorpability, Bones, and Media Literacy. This scale has gained some traction amongst little guy scholars, though it has yet to attain widespread adoption; many little guy enthusiasts[who?] argue that little guys are impossible to quantify on a scale due to their transient and impressionistic qualities.
